Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3381 - 3400
of 51,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In those other cases—chiefly Loving v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
And, as the Court says, the day has long passed since the Due Process Clause was regarded as a proper instrument for determining “the wisdom, need, and propriety” of state laws. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm
In his great 1953 concurrence in Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
Champagne Louis Roderer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Precedent from the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
It’s hard to celebrate for too long, however, because this case is almost certainly headed to the 11th Circuit. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:17 pm
Ala.) in today's Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:55 am
United States—the first since the D.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:25 am
Continuing its long string of affirmances in crack resentencing cases, the Third Circuit affirmed the denial of sentence reduction for an eligible defendant in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:01 pm
Based on a recent United States Supreme Court decision, Padilla v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
In Obaidi v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:25 pm
In a case captioned State v Federico, the NJ Appellate Division held that a defendant convicted of a DWI offense and multiple other traffic offenses may not be sentenced to more than 180 days in county jail. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
Co-authored by Jeffrey Berman, Dana Peterson, and Brandon McKelvey The California Supreme Court announced today that it will issue its decision at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow in the much-anticipated meal and rest period case of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
In the automobile accident case of Wakole v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 3:39 am
The recent Belgian decision in SABAM v. [read post]
