Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 pm
Facts: This case (Design Ideas Ltd v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Krumpelbeck v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
” Buck v. [read post]
Third Circuit Finds Defendant Was Not Seized Where He Briefly Paused and Raised Hands Before Fleeing
15 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:55 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 6/9/09Cite: The Clorox Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
"The Board found the mark to be at most suggestive of the goods. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
" United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
