Search for: "State v. Money" Results 3381 - 3400 of 20,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 1:35 pm
In a decision resolving six consolidated appeals beginning with United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” More details on the Anthem data breach case discussed earlier here, and Ted Frank’s role in calling it into question [Bob Dorigo Jones] Also, for those with access, Ted has written a piece for the Wall Street Journal on the need to rein in abuse of the cy pres doctrine in disbursing lawsuit proceeds, with a suitable vehicle on the horizon: A bipartisan coalition of 16 state attorneys general is also urging the Supreme Court to hear Frank v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:32 pm by Carter Ruml
We’re proud to present our KYEstates Florida v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
Paper money is an entirely visual affair in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
You Supreme Court nerds out there (and you know who you are) are probably aware of the fact that the United States Supreme Court  recently heard oral arguments in  McWilliams v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:55 am by Robin Frazer Clark
You Supreme Court nerds out there (and you know who you are) are probably aware of the fact that the United States Supreme Court  recently heard oral arguments in  McWilliams v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
You can certainly argue that content nowadays often involves a non-monetary quid pro quo, so looking to whether the consumer pays money is a poor metric. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
• (g) all claims asserted by you individually against us . . . including claims for money damages and/or equitable or injunctive relief; . . . [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Inc. v New York State Dept. of Audit & Control, 2009 NY Slip Op 29071, Decided on February 20, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Platkin, J.The U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs ' malpractice claim for a defense founded upon documentary evidence and failure to state a cause of action is denied. [read post]