Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 9:16 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Sierra Club v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm
In affirming the verdict and interest award, the court of appeals stated: The phrase “interruption of business,” as used in section 13Q of the DIC policy, does not require ADM to show that its corn processing plants stopped or slowed production. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:10 am
Celeste Walker v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
Eric Glass advises that “[v]irtually all bonds issued in the municipal market with maturities greater than 10 years come with a 10-year call option to be triggered at the discretion of the issuer”. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 11:26 am
The Supreme Court of Tennessee, in the 1983 case Blasingame v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 6:33 am
As to preliminary references, there were three rulings in 2022 concerning trademarks and one on designs (C-421/20, Acacia v BMW). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:09 am
In duPont v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):A method for controlling phytopathogenic harmful fungi, characterised in that the fungi or the materials, plants, the soil or seeds to be protected against fungal attack are treated with an effective amount of a compound of formula I wherein X is C1-C12 alkylene or C2-C12 alkenylene, where the carbon chains may be interrupted by one or two heteroatoms selected from the group consisting of S, O and NR1 , R1 is… [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:06 pm
Blommer v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:07 am
The five categories of green technologies listed by the BRPTO are: (i) alternative energies; (ii) transportation; (iii) energy conservation; (iv) waste management; and (v) sustainable agriculture. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Vance v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 7:00 pm
A recent Ontario decision, White v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
Decision In Zhang v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Of course many media outlets are picking up on United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
In 2009, the civil case of Wiwa v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
Further, Ricoh asserts that it satisfies the domestic industry (economic prong) requirement through "Ricoh's significant investment in plant, labor, capital, research & development, and licensing with respect to such articles protected by the asserted patents. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:51 am
During the same night the young Ochsenknechts were also seen tearing out plants from gardens and destroying a public phone booth. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:58 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
