Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
For example, in 2009, Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in Sundlin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Metts v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
The case of Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:35 pm
The recent case is State v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:28 pm
Authors from across the country each take on a famous labour case in a series of case studies, from early cases about constitutional jurisdiction (Snider; John East), though picketing classics (Hersees; Harrison v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:49 am
Additional Resources: David v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
The following excerpts are just a sampling of his criticism. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:29 am
Now, in Tart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Santoro v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
The Brady rule resulted from a 1963 Supreme Court case, aptly named Brady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
And Kara Bruce’s and Alex Sickler’s co-authored essay reviews the state of FDCPA litigation in chapter 13 cases in light of Midland Funding v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm
Thursday, November 13th at 10 am: Finally, we remind you that oral arguments in USA v. al Nashiri will resume on Thursday at 10 am in the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 10:08 am
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
First, pollsters use much smaller samples on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
In Goodwin v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) the Supreme Court upheld British Columbia’s ARP scheme as valid provincial law that does not unlawfully invade federal criminal law power or contravene section 11 of the Charter, but the Court also ruled that the seizure of a breath sample using an approved screening device (ASD) under the scheme as previously administered was an unreasonable seizure under section 8 of the Charter. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:24 am
The Court’s decision in ATSC Aviation, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:21 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
In the notorious PLIVA v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:24 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Property Reserve v. [read post]
