Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 7:54 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
Compare Dynasty Sample Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:37 pm
He then provided a blood sample which later came back with a .07 blood alcohol concentration, or BAC, result. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:44 am
App. 2001); First State Sav. and Loan v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 am
As the London Times explained in 2004, those samples are legally considered the cultural property of the recipient government, and other samples located in the U.S. are classified as national treasure under NASA Policy Directive 7100.10D (since renumbered as NPD 7100.10E).Over the last four decades, many of the goodwill gifts have made their way to the black market, and some have also made their way to the courts: check out the descriptively-named case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:14 pm
At his sentencing before then-Judge, now Ohio Supreme Court Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger, here's what happened per the appellate court's opinion in State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
For instance, 11% of the fathers in the sample who were the main decisionmakers as to the circumcision gave the father’s being circumcised as “the most important reason” to circumcise their sons. [read post]
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
No case like this holds that forced catheterization for a urine sample is unreasonable or reasonable. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:15 am
” The Commission cited, among others, the Federal Circuit’s decisions in Riverwood Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:38 am
On appeal from: [2010] EWHC 2225 (Admin) The appellants had both been acquitted of previous charges, though after their arrest the police had taken DNA and fingerprint samples. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:35 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 1:31 pm
See Darley v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
” And thank you for stating the obvious. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:30 pm
The Court rejected Sprint’s reliance on Preston v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
At the request of the federal regulators, FDACS sent oyster samples from the closed harvesting area to an FDA lab for analysis. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:56 pm
” People v Crear, 242 Mich App 158, 166; 618 NW2d 91 (2000), overruled in part on other grounds People v Miller, 482 Mich 540; 759 NW2d 850 (2008). [read post]
