Search for: "State v. Stevens" Results 3381 - 3400 of 7,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Chief Justice William Howard Taft in Meyers v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am by Amy Howe
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Reed, the Court found that disclosure of the identities of petition signers did not, absent a particularized showing, so chill their petition signing as to violate their free speech rights; and in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am by Joshua Matz
United States and Hill v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the Horn defendants), and Audrey Sager, Esq., Steven Gellerman, Esq., and Sager & Gellerman, Esq. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:08 am by Amy Howe
In a podcast for Dropout Nation, California state senator Gloria Romano discusses “her amicus brief in theFriedrichs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Holland & Hart
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
   ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]