Search for: "State v. White" Results 3381 - 3400 of 13,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:47 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
OCT. 10, 2015 “They are overwhelmingly white, rich, older and male, in a nation that is being remade by the young, by women, and by black and brown voters. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:14 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
Notification of the white-paper to the NCA: some Member States questioned the mechanisms of the mandatory notification of the white-paper to Member State competent authorities (NCAs), including in respect of a related marketing communication, others proposed further amendments addressing – among other – the role of ESMA. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
United States was filed with assistance from the ACLU. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:36 am by John Elwood
  Ed states: According to reliable sources, the White House had settled on [Sri] Srinivasan to fill one of the two vacancies on the D.C. [read post]
Whilst the long-term effects of Ivey remain to be seen, one area which may be particularly sensitive to its effects is white-collar crime. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by David Super
  With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
The father has only a distant Cherokee ancestor - isn’t he more white than Indian? [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am by John Jascob
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]