Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2019, 2:03 am
If the guarantee also states that the guarantor is also a principal debtor, then on that ground no formal demand is actually required unless the wording of the guarantee agreement provides otherwise. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
First, if you are an investor seeking to contract with a sovereign state, you should ensure that the wording of your agreement contains express submission to the jurisdiction(s) of your choice, both for adjudication, and for enforcement. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
However, they rejected the appellant’s submission that this conclusion follows from the wording of POCA 2002, because of the principle enunciated in R v Waya [2012] UKSC 51 that property obtained as a result of or in connection with crime remains the defendant’s benefit whether or not he retains it. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 3:41 pm
In Miranda v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND NEW ZEALAND BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition between the United States of America and New Zealand was signed at Washington on January 12, 1970, the original of which Treaty is word for word as follows: The United States of America and New Zealand, desiring to make more effective the cooperation of the two… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:23 am
US v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
USA v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
" A final message dated July 11, 2001 states:“Well, this last batch pretty much tears it. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm
In Kyllo v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 12:30 pm
In Kyllo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Oliver Couture Part 1 of the review of Athena Diagnostics v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
This Manual will serve as a guide; it is not the final word in all cases. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Lyons v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
” State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
In other words - do they raise an inference of copying? [read post]
