Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
[11] https://www.fashionapparellawblog.com/2017/04/articles/enforcement-of-fashion-laws/brands-beware-ftc-endorsement-guides/; https://www.fashionapparellawblog.com/2017/07/articles/enforcement-of-fashion-laws/ftc-social-media-influencers/. [12] The International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network is comprised of consumer protection agencies from over sixty countries and has published guidelines developed to help parties comply with truth-in- [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
[11] https://www.fashionapparellawblog.com/2017/04/articles/enforcement-of-fashion-laws/brands-beware-ftc-endorsement-guides/; https://www.fashionapparellawblog.com/2017/07/articles/enforcement-of-fashion-laws/ftc-social-media-influencers/. [12] The International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network is comprised of consumer protection agencies from over sixty countries and has published guidelines developed to help parties comply with truth-in- [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In California’s case, the RDAs were nothing more than the locality’s tax-protected alter ego: Which is good, which isn’t? [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:20 am
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:54 pm
Bank v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:40 pm
This post concerns a similar case to the Hale v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean that any member of the public will actually show up. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:34 pm
In Broke Ass Phone v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
I wonder if older cases skewed this up. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 am
At some point, consumers have to be expected to make smart decisions for themselves. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
The note observes the tension between the selection of the statutist approach or conventional choice of law rules as an analytical starting point, in difficult consumer protection cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 3:23 am
The Supreme Court keeps saying -- we mean what we say (Simmons v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
So consumers, and the health care system, are considerably worse off. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Thanks to Kent Piacenti for re-upping to do a few more installments. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm
” New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman gave the game away when he explained that they would be pursuing completely different theories in different jurisdictions — some under pension laws, some consumer protection, some securities fraud. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 8:19 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has recently ruled on the case of Hewlett-Packard Belgium v Reprobel (C‑572/1). [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:57 pm
Young, Note: Universal City Studios Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
And, occasionally, guys selling drugs on the corner had to protect their turf or deal with a consumer who didn’t feel like paying. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:51 am
Massachusetts follows the economic loss rule, under which purely economic losses can’t be recovered in tort actions absent personal injury or property damage, and applies that rule to tort claims dressed up as contract claims and consumer protection claims. [read post]
