Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
When the Court first embraced the categoric approach in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 6:21 am
Taylor Published: 1/3/2011 12:01 PM [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
(See Guest Post from Eric Jon Taylor and Jon Chally at CAFA Law Blog for more on the first decision and this October 20 CAB entry on the second decision). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Lacy-McKinney v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:30 pm
Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortg. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
Yesterday, the Hawaii Supreme Court granted cert in a tax case styled CompUSA Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
Determining membership in a negotiating unit for the purposes of collective bargainingRockland County v Federation of Teachers Local 1817, 275 AD2d 413Clearly the incumbents of positions in the negotiating unit are covered by collective bargaining contracts negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law.Is an agreement between the parties to include a particular individual in the negotiating unit if the position filled by that individual is not included in the negotiating unit enforceable? [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:09 pm
Larmer v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:19 am
USA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
See, for example, City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2 104, a case addressing a conflict between a Taylor Law contract provision and the Civil Service Law with regard to the layoff rights of employees. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
The back page editorial is the worst; only Phil Taylor ever gives due regard to what might be considered the opposition view. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:04 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
Criminal investigations and the Taylor lawNew York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273With increasing frequency, procedures addressing employee rights in the course of an employer-initiated investigation are being included in Taylor Law agreements. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
"Another element to consider: the impact the Taylor Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:39 am
”)AC30464 - Taylor v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
Taylor, J.A. for the Court quoted the well-known statement of principle of Lord Atkinson in Toronto Ry. [read post]