Search for: "U.S. CONGRESS"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 58,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2023, 11:04 am
This difference is an indication that Congress meant the Exchange Act provision to prohibit conduct and not speech. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:24 am
With the concurrence of the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:16 am
According to the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:30 am
Just imagine how hard it would be to talk about tax policy with someone who doesn't know that the U.S. has an income tax or even what it is. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 7:21 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Kagan enters fray over Congress’ power to police Supreme Court (Josh Gerstein, Politico) Trump calls for Supreme Court to ‘intercede’ against Biden after third indictment (Kevin Breuninger, CNBC) Senate Democrats ask for Alito to be recused from Supreme Court ethics and tax cases (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) After Supreme Court victory, anti-affirmative action group turns to military academy exemption (Rachel Nostrant, Reuters) … [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
MSN – Mike McIntire (New York Times) | Published: 7/30/2023 Long before the National Rifle Association (NRA) tightened its grip on Congress and won over the Supreme Court, U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:19 am
Congress felt that the laws prior to DASCA failed to sufficiently curtail the misuse of anabolic steroids. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:05 pm
The Department-wide Manual reflects the views of the Department of Defense and does not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:51 am
The Fake Electors The Special Counsel’s summary of the third part of the conspiracy can be found on pages 21 to 27 of the indictment and is titled, “The Defendant’s Use of Dishonesty, Fraud, and Deceit to Organize Fraudulent Slates of Electors and Cause Them to Transmit False Certificates to Congress. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
It comports with what Congress almost certainly had in mind when it enacted the relevant statutory provision. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
Barnes, 2 U.S. 401, was the first US Supreme Court decision and the earliest case calling for oral argument. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
If (as it said in both these cases) the Court will not readily assume Congress intended to confer the power to executive agencies to resolve “major” policy questions, why would the Court ever assume Congress has attempted to delegate the power to interpret the law itself, which might be thought of, categorically, as a major question.Does this mean that Congress can never confer power onto the Executive branch to interpret key statutory terms? [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:27 pm
The U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 1:44 pm
Escobar, 579 U.S. 176 (2016) (“Escobar”). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 12:54 pm
Mike Lee (R-Utah) sent a letter to Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter arguing that the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
FINRA is overseen by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is authorized by Congress to protect U.S. investors from investment fraud by making sure the broker-dealer industry operates fairly and honestly. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
When U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:06 am
– to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:59 am
Nebraska, 600 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
It has been almost five months since the U.S. [read post]
