Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3381 - 3400 of 9,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2018, 2:59 pm by Frederick Robinson (US)
U.S. ex rel Escobar, the United States Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the materiality standard in False Claims Act cases. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 7:10 am by Thomas Long
Matal, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1928, 22 December 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
It was said by the President of the United States, but at a private meeting, where I presume he, like many Presidents before him say "fuck" and other bad words all the time. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:11 pm by Lara Fowler
Edwin Kneedler, deputy solicitor general, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:49 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
 Like John Doe, he was a Saudi citizen but had a claim to birthright citizenship in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Samuel Estreicher
This aspect of Steel Seizure highlights what is particularly problematic about Obama’s decision to aggregate authorities in the sanctions laws and to commit the United States to an across-the-board waiver of nuclear sanctions against Iran. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
J[ay] Blackledge was born in the Ukraine in 2008 but is a United States citizen. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Harleen Gambhir
Department of State, and Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]