Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 3381 - 3400 of 6,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley
”The procedural issue presented in Dupree v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
  [some punctuation cleaned up] The United States Chamber of Commerce was of the same view and gave the SEC three suggestions that explained how it could quantify the proposed rule’s effects. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm
In fact in 2009 alone, over 80 percent of people in the United States were treated in our health care system in one year. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Relying on the 2019 Supreme Court of the United Kingdom decision in Ca [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:31 am by Joseph Hackenbracht
Once Todd’s journey in the Court of Federal Claims came to an end, Todd had two choices: abandon pursuit of its claim or appeal the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
But that's not an approach you can embrace if - like many progressives - you applaud the Supreme Court's 20th century gutting of precedents protecting contract and property rights, and would be happy to see it overrule Citizens United v. [read post]