Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 16,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2019, 10:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm
The court declined to retain jurisdiction of state law claims and dismissed the case, though without prejudice to a state court filing of the state law claims. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The rule does not apply to individuals who have previously been denied asylum in one or more countries through which they traveled prior to arrival in the United States, victims of human trafficking, or individuals who have only passed through nations that have not signed international treaties on refugee protection. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
The court built upon that flawed decision in 2001’s Circuit City v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 12:52 pm
§ 285Enforceable Patent Rights to Research Institutions and their Exclusive LicenseesAppeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in Nos. 3:13-cv-00651-JLS- MDD, 3:13-cv-00830-JLS-MDD, 3:13-cv-01015-JLS-MDD, Judge Janis L. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 10:53 am
The case was voluntarily dismissed by LHO and after being denied their Lanham Act attorney fees, the Defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Fitisemanu et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Fitisemanu et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm
The Second Circuit (Sullivan, Chin and Parker [dissenting in part] says: Our case law is clear: 'it is not the proper role of courts to encourage nullification.' United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States, No. 19-10011 (5th Cir. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Circuit. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:16 pm
United States, the challenge to the constitutionality of the ACA. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
Flández-Marcel, 2019 WL 6836785 (First Circuit, 2019) the district court denied Alejandro Díaz-Alarcón petition for return of his daughter from the United States to Chile. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
[The 5th Circuit follows NFIB v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:41 pm
"] The Fifth Circuit decided Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit would decide Texas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am
” In an op-ed for the New York Post, Rich Lowry maintains that by “declining to take up an appeal of a ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, covering the western United States, that homeless encampments are a de facto constitutional right,” “[t]he Supreme Court just ensured that the nation’s homelessness crisis will continue. [read post]
