Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 5,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, General Electric v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm
An applicant or his or her counsel should submit the electronic equivalent of soft copies taken from one of the United States Patent & Trademark Office’s (USPTO) automatic systems. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
See also Fields v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm
United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
• The stated purpose of the corporation in the charter is “to continue the operation of an Episcopal Diocese under the Constitution and Canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo Place-and-Time-Shifting Technology Case Note by Gordon Firemark On June 25, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Co v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
Section 1 (3) defines the “art” to mean the art or field of knowledge to which an invention relates and “the state of the art” means everything concerning that art or field of knowledge which has been made available to the public anywhere and at any time whatever (by means of a written or oral description, by use or in any other way) before the date of the filing of the patent application relating to the invention... [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:44 am
One patent lawsuit, Stryker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:47 am
From United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
