Search for: "United States v. House" Results 3381 - 3400 of 11,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 5:53 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Exhibit A is the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 ("HERA"), enacted after the United States housing bubble burst and triggered a massive mortgage-security and generalcredit crisis. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:40 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Let’s assume that an ordinary window has been removed from a living room, and the stained glass unit inserted in its place, with silicone, and that the stained glass is what the purchaser saw before agreeing to buy the house. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:49 am
Last week I noted the story and decision of City of Springfield Code Enforcement v. [read post]
The bill’s provisions were invalidated by Supreme Court rulings in United Sates v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Mark Litwak
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 4:39 pm
Abbott In response to low production of affordable housing units, the City of Santa Monica adopted new and amended ordinances to increase the supply of affordable housing in June, 2006. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 6:10 am by Ezra Rosser
In April of 2016, the Office of General Counsel for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued much anticipated guidance dealing directly with the racially disparate impact of barring those with criminal records from public and private housing. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]