Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 5,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down a case earlier this year, Johnson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Rumsfeld and Celikgogus v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
These propositions have been recognized by courts at every level, from the United States Supreme Court on down. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:45 am
But NFIB v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
The question in Rosemond v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:53 am
Second Lawsuit: Young v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:31 pm
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:32 am
Marsh v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
While state-sanctioned lotteries are widely acknowledged to be a “tax on the stupid,” Washington is jealous of government’s monopoly on that tax as much as many others. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm
Hungar of the Washington office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, with twenty minutes of time. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Background Ninety-three years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Missouri v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:39 pm
Evans in 1996– which struck down a Colorado voter initiative that abolished antidiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation –to U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am
., partner at Covington & Burling LLP in Washington, D.C., and chairman of The Media Institute’s First Amendment Advisory Council. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:16 am
v=cyJ_OcyYqZY, last accessed on October 14, 2013). [read post]
