Search for: "Williams v. A"
Results 3381 - 3400
of 19,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 1:00 am
Supreme Court Deference to Agencies, 1981-2006: An Empirical and Normative Examination William N. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Supreme Court bar by the Court's clerk, General William K. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Supreme Court bar by the Court's clerk, General William K. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
Williams v Silverstone 2023 NY Slip Op 01917 Decided on April 12, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a common or varietal version of motion to dismiss decisions in legal malpractice settings. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:20 pm
Williams (Ill. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:44 am
Huckabee proposes the cutting of government funding to NPR because of its speech decisions regarding Juan Williams. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:44 am
Huckabee proposes the cutting of government funding to NPR because of its speech decisions regarding Juan Williams. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:08 am
William D. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:29 am
William Gagne, Jr. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:24 pm
Discrimination/RetaliationWilliams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:09 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
William Jimenez, No. 21-2954 (2d Cir. [read post]
