Search for: "clarence" Results 3381 - 3400 of 8,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
  Specifically, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the unanimous decision there are "no evidentiary restrictions" to be placed on patent application challenges beyond the normal restrictions applicable to federal cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:03 am
  Only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, says he would have relied not on the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, but on the Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm by Bruce Carton
Justice Stephen Breyer: 56 laughs Chief Justice John Roberts: 30 laughs Justice Elena Kagan: 15 laughs Justice Anthony Kennedy: 14 laughs Justice Samuel Alito: 7 laughs Justice Sonia Sotomayor: 6 laughs Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 2 laughs Justice Clarence Thomas: 0 laughs Wexler also offers a list of some of funnyman Scalia's greatest hits,... [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:02 am by Glenn Reynolds
The article is about Virginia Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who has just founded Liberty Central Inc., a conservative activist group. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:09 pm
  Judge Ardaiz describes his experience attending the 2006 execution of Clarence Ray Allen, whom Ardaiz prosecuted back in 1977. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Ronn Blitzer of Fox News reports that “Black Lives Matter activist slams Clarence Thomas after Supreme Court ruling in police officer lawsuit; Thomas was the lone dissenting justice in a 7-1 decision. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm by brian
The six exonerees scheduled to attend as specal guests spent more than 50 years on death row for crimes they did not commit: Anthony Graves, Clarence Brandley, Shujaa Graham, Ron Keine, Gary Drinkard and Albert Burrell. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 8:04 am by Ronald Mann
Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer filed concurring opinions. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas also agreed with the outcome, but wrote separately. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance National: “Appeals Court Reverses Conviction Against Jeff Fortenberry” by Eric Bazail-Eimil (Politico) for MSN New York: “Hochul Vetoes Controversial Campaign Finance Changes” by Joshua Solomon for Albany Times Union Elections Maine: “Donald Trump Removed from Maine Primary Ballot by Secretary of State” by Patrick Marley (Washington Post) for MSN Michigan: “Michigan Supreme Court Allows Trump to Appear on… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:06 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Take this line from a recent Slate piece: This has political implications, certainly, but my concern here is with the next generation of liberal law students, who continue to hear the message that their heroes are presumptively ineligible for a seat at the high court, whereas the brightest lights of the Federalist Society—Judge Brett Kavanaugh, professor Richard Epstein, Clarence Thomas, Theodore Olsen, Ken Starr, and Michael McConnell—are either already on the bench or… [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:15 pm by Walter Olson
Cato-intensive edition: David Bernstein’s Rehabilitating Lochner, recently praised by George Will, is part of Cato series challenging constitutional law myths [Roger Pilon, earlier; Bernstein's recommended-books list] Constitutional conservatism: the forgotten history [Johnathan O'Neill, Heritage] “Progressive originalism” a development to be welcomed, but faces uphill slog [Damon Root, Reason] Tim Lynch: constitution is too hard to amend ["Amending Article… [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 3:18 am by doug
But the Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, said they were too late, and rejected the creditor’s request — supported by your U.S. government, by the way — to use federal procedural rules to overturn final judgments. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:27 pm by Walter Olson
Still, eight Justices were content to resolve the dispute on relatively dry statutory interpretation grounds, with only Justice Clarence Thomas interested in interrogating the law at a more fundamental level. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:07 am by thenambypamby
I don’t care if you’re Clarence Darrow or a Moot Court participant, there is not a class offered on how to take a moment of personal privilege while you are in the middle of your case in chief. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:11 pm by Amy Howe
Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch indicated that they would have denied Murphy’s request. [read post]