Search for: "A B" Results 3401 - 3420 of 158,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Lyle Roberts
  Rule 10b-5(b) does not proscribe pure omissions. . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm by Laura
Some decisions can be take unilaterally by parent A, some decisions require parent A to inform parent B, but not obtain parent B’s consent, and other decisions require the consent of parent A and parent B. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 5:56 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
According to the Sacramento Fire Department, the crash happened around 5:24 p.m. near Dos Rios and North B streets. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
RBKC is a person who manages premises and is a controller of let premises, namely, in this case, Flat 7. ii) FG relies on section 32(3)(b) of the Equality Act 2010 to exclude the letting of Flat 7 from Part 4 of the Equality Act 2010, but this is wrong. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am by Jocelyn Bosse
This is a review of the book, The Elgar Companion to Intellectual Property and the Sustainable Development Goals, edited by Bita Amani, Caroline B. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:12 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
§ 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take,... [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The Defend Trade Secrets Act provides a variety of remedies, at 18 U.S.C. section 1836(b)(3)(B), including damages for actual loss, unjust enrichment caused by the misappropriation, or damages measured by the imposition of liability for a reasonably royalty for the misappropriator’s unauthorized disclosure or use of the trade secret. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The first year of law school usually includes an introduction of some kind to the doctrine of stare decisis (or precedent) and the related concepts of dicta and holdings. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Most notably, § 154(b)(2)(B) expressly provides that PTA cannot extend a patent’s term beyond the date specified in a terminal disclaimer. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court held that a failure to disclose information required under Item 303 of Regulation S-K is, standing alone, not an actionable omission under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Este evento busca promover el diálogo alrededor de los temas de crisis climática y educación y estimular la búsqueda de soluciones que adelanten la meta de construir una sociedad más equitativa y preparada ante el calentamiento global. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
Antisemitism and French criminal law In Allouche v France [2024] ECHR 305  Ms Allouche, who is Jewish, found herself in a disturbing relationship with one B, a bartender in a café near her workplace, which ended with him sending her antisemitic e-mail threats of violence, rape and death. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/503(b) Property earned during the marriage but paid out after the marriage may still be deemed a marital, and thus divisible) asset. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Moab Partners unanimously held that a “pure omission”—the failure to disclose information in the absence of an inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading statement—cannot give rise to liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Rule 10b-5 thereunder, even where there is an affirmative regulatory duty to disclose the omitted information. [read post]