Search for: "BAKER V. STATE"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 3,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2007, 10:34 am
State of Indiana (NFP) S.G. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:06 pm
King v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:21 pm
NFP criminal opinions today (2): State of Indiana v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:22 am
John Tuohy of the Indianapolis Star writes today about the Court of Appeals ruling April 30th in the case of Indiana State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 1:36 am
Ct.'s decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:46 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): Walter Baker v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:54 pm
As Maj Belliss started to respond, Judge Baker jumped in asking if the affidavit was even before them. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:30 pm
(By the way Bill, 4 is not the record for a single day, on 30 Sep 2005 for instance, CAAF decided 6 cases and I suspect that CAAF has done more on previous end-of-term days).United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Henry Lewis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
Tomorrow morning the Court will hear oral argument in No. 05-1448, Beck v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 11:59 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Brian Blake v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:30 pm
Conn. 2004) (quoting Baker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
Universal Outdoor Inc., an 8-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-plaintiff State of Indiana (the State) appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Universal Outdoors, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
Anti-Retaliation Under Federal and State Discrimination & Wage-Hour Laws; Implications of Burlington Northern v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Alva Leslie Funk v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:34 am
Morera, M.D. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:00 am
Panel V: Is It Valid to Assume that Vertical Arrangements (Merger and Distribution) Can Very Rarely Injure Consumer Welfare? [read post]
