Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 3401 - 3420 of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 7:59 am
A party challenging a statute must bear the burden of proving it unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm by William Funk
 Unlike Justice Scalia’s diatribe against wetland protection in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
The Supreme Court, in the case of AR v RN (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 35 has confirmed that habitual residence is a question of fact rather than legal construct. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
The recent Tesla v BBC case ([2012] EWHC 310 (QB)) is a notable exception. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 9:33 am
In Opuz v Turkey, discussed in a previous post on IntLawGrrls, the applicant alleged that the state bore responsibility under the European Convention on Human Rights for its failure to take action against her violent husband who repeatedly attacked her and killed her mother.The European Court had previously found state responsibility in a domestic violence case in Bevacqua and S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]