Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 3401 - 3420 of 8,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
City of Farmers Branch, 496 F.Supp.2d 757 (N.D.Tex., 2007).Perhaps the best summary, however, comes from another Brennan opinion not long after De Canas dealing with state laws that piggyback on Federal immigration laws, Plyler v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
Reece describes ways in which all three branches of government can begin to make up for their awful record in this field: All three branches of government could act to end racial profiling in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch, heard 27 January 2015. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Tobias Lutzi
Even the fact that a foreign state was a party to the lease agreement does not, in the view of the Court, change this, since the embassy, acting both as the agent of the foreign state and as the institution responsible for the further implementation of the lease agreement, constitutes a branch within the meaning of Art. 19(2) of the Rome I Regulation (“If the contract is concluded in the course of the business of a branch, agency or other establishment, or… [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
For instance, in Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:57 am by Michael Lowe
The Texas Legislature is in session right now and one thing that is being considered by the lawmakers this year is a new law proposed by Representative Harold V. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 11:58 am by Chase Strangio
” And we now have a president who is planning to follow the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  This problem has become acute for the Judicial Branch. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am by SHG
Indeed, no amendment that has cleared Article V’s two high bars has ever been excluded from the Constitution — until now. [read post]