Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 3401 - 3420 of 4,788
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am by Bill Raftery
As of today, the status of the 47 breaks down as follows: 38 died due to adjournment or had been rejected by their respective legislatures. 1 was signed into law (Arizona’s HB 2064 on April 12). 8 remain at least theoretically active: 4 in Alabama; 3 in Iowa; 1 in North Carolina. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGIA TSAIRIS, deceased, ESX-CP-0070-2009 & ESX-C-245-08, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., May 31, 2011: The first element necessary to raise a presumption of undue influence, a “confidential relationship” between the testator and a beneficiary, arises where trust is reposed by reason of the testator’s weakness or dependence or where the parties occupied relations in which reliance is naturally inspired or in… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Romania International Extradition Treaty with the United States September 10, 2007, Date-Signed May 8, 2009, Date-In-Force LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, January 22, 2008. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF GEORGIA TSAIRIS, deceased, ESX-CP-0070-2009 & ESX-C-245-08, Walter Koprowski, Jr., J.S.C., May 31, 2011: Where a Will remains unrevoked and unaltered while in the testator’s custody for some time after execution, the presumption of undue influence may be overcome. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(c) Mutiny or conspiracy by two or more members of the crew or other persons on board of a vessel on the high seas, for the purpose of rebelling against the authority of the captain or commander of such vessel, or by fraud or violence taking possession of such vessel. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty’s political offense exception is substantially identical to that contained in several other modern extradition treaties, including the treaty with Jordan, which recently received Senate advice and consent. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm by Daniel Low
Accordingly, concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, the Parties will exchange executed copies of the stipulation substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C and Defendant will promptly file it with the Court. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It also specifies the following specific categories of offenses that are not to be considered political offenses: (a) a murder or other violent crime against a Head of State of one of the Contracting States, or a member of a Head of State’s family; (b) genocide, as described in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, done at Paris on December 9, 1948; (c) an offense for which both Contracting States have the obligation pursuant to a… [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article X(4) provides that if the Requested State’s diplomatic authority has not received the request for extradition and supporting documentation within sixty (60) days after the provisional arrest, the person may be discharged from custody. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
We expect to continue the present practice under which each country is represented in extradition proceedings by the other’s Justice Department. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:48 am by Shouse Law Group
A subsequent offense is a category C felony carrying one to five years in prison and up to $10,000 in fines. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:28 pm by Marty Lederman
The operation was conducted in a manner fully consistent with the laws of war.The operation was planned so that the team was prepared and had the means to take bin Laden into custody. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:31 pm by Marty Lederman
The operation was planned so that the team was prepared and had the means to take bin Laden into custody. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:18 pm by W.F. "Casey" Ebsary, Jr.
(c) Any motor vehicle used in violation of subsection (2) may be impounded for a period of 30 business days if a law enforcement officer has arrested and taken a person into custody pursuant to this subsection and the person being arrested is the registered owner or coowner of the motor vehicle. [read post]