Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 1:59 am
McKee v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
The action set out detailed factual findings and concluded that "[o]ne of ordinary skill in the art . . . would have been motivated to provide the [first reference device] with a [second reference's filter having a particular flow passage configuration] since [the second reference] states . . . that such filters 'have a very high mechanical stability and a relatively high insensitivity to impact, as can happen during transport and assembly,' 'remain operative for a… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:28 am
(in Chambers) did not permit her to proceed and stated: [3] As I see the present situation, Mrs. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
In today’s case (Toukaev v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:52 pm
Emma Foubister is a trainee barrister at Matrix Chambers [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
PART V – RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS Sergio M. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
The bill would override the Supreme Court's rulings in Sutton v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:29 am
(Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
The petitions of the day are: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:15 pm
" Activists think they have the needed support, but Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:10 am
(See Watts v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm
He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am
The application which came before me, on 22 July 2016 not long before 1700 hours in chambers, was for interim suspension of the warrant. [read post]
