Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 7,398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 8:17 am
But it would matter at least in a hortatory sense - one presumably shouldn't commit felonies, even if one can't be prosecuted, and if one does then one faces criticism on that ground. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:38 pm
Property owned by the decedent’s surviving spouse does not include the value of enhancements to the surviving spouse’s earning capacity (e.g., the value of a law, medical, or business degree). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm
In such a case, the child does not become estranged from the genetic family. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:27 pm
An important question is then: what causes us to accept mechanism X or institution Z as legitimate? [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 2:45 pm
How long does someone have to pay? [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
The present case does not fall into any of the categories where we can determine, as a matter of law, that reasonable diligence would have timely un [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:07 pm
But I believe that any choice is due to a level of freedom. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:57 am
I look forward to hearing from you. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:30 am
The fact that one authority confers limitations on the government’s ability to do X means nothing so long as another authority confers on the government comparatively unbounded power to do X. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:05 pm
Here is the text of the rule, which does not yet appear to be on the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:34 am
(The later discussion on the Wikipedia page does explain the true solution, but I’m not sure that the criticism of the intuitive solutions really shows clearly enough why the intuitive solutions of the type I described above are false.) [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
(The common logic of cross– “You just testified to X. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
(The common logic of cross– “You just testified to X. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:21 am
If I were a Chinese employee, I would argue that a contract like this does not qualify and I would expect the Chinese arbiters to concur with that. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:06 pm
Canada: design does extend to fashio [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:03 pm
Does R E L X stand for: R: Reed E: Elsevier LX: LexisNexis?? [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 12:36 pm
Based on guidance from USCIS during the last government shutdown, in 2013, it is likely employers will need to follow these protocols should E-Verify be offline: Form I-9 Form I-9 requirements are not affected during a federal government shutdown. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
I was an avid hunter until I married (Kathy, being a vet, does not like for me to shoot anything unless it needs being shot). [read post]
