Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
While the Bill does seek to change the standard of proof against patent applications and patent oppositions from the existing “practically certain to fail” or “clear” type standard to the usual “balance of probabilities (see e.g. items 14 and 15 of Sch 1), no such amendment is proposed for trade mark oppositions. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In Example 2, it is stated that for screening a cDNA library from Humicola insolens and for cloning a cDNA encoding the endoglucanase “(t)he oligonucleotide probes were made on the basis of amino acid sequences of tryptic fragments of the purified ~ 43 kD endoglucanase” and several probes are disclosed in Table 1 of document D1 […]. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:49 pm
See -Larson's Workers Compensation Law, Ch. 43, [1][b] n42] Effect of Successive or Concurrent Injuries on Maximum Award Generally, as to maximum weekly benefits, combined weekly benefits for the two injuries should never be higher than the weekly maximum for total disability. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
(2) If the Requested Party does not extradite its own national, it shall, at the request of the Requesting Party, submit the case to its competent authorities in order that proceedings may be taken if its law so provides. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
This does not give rise to any objections. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
However, only 20% of young students in Brazil find a place at the university system, different from the 43% in Chile or 61% in Argentina. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
However, only 20% of young students in Brazil find a place at the university system, different from the 43% in Chile or 61% in Argentina. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
In addition, the dog's owner must also: 1. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am
Ownership of a mark under the Lanham Act is determined by use, and registration does not necessarily create ownership. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
However, there was no case law to support this, especially when defendants didn’t claim that the products were the current line—which the court commented would give rise to a §43(a)(1)(B) claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:21 pm
Also, this is very much an opinion piece, even more so than usual…) 1. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Does that suggest the PTO is a rubber stamp? [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
Hmmmm, does this GREATERADE trademark remind you of a certain product that you see in every grocery store, convenience store, supermarket, and gas station? [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Population Aging Americans are an important part of the population-learn about their impact here. 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
But because this statistic was relayed amidst a discussion of "effective tax rates," it is important to clarify that 1.8% does not represent or approximate the average effective tax rate for US corporations. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
As intended there Zometa is a type of drug learned intermediary doctrine encourages a doctor-patient dialogue.Zometa does not fall within the exception of the restatement and I, therefore, find a direct warning to Mr. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:40 am
The performance results for several of the earlier Apple REITsare themselves misleading because (1) they do not reflect the recent reduction in distributionrates and (2) DLA does not disclose that income from those REITs was insufficient to supporttheir 7–8 percent returns and that the distributions were partially funded by debt that furtherleveraged the REITs. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
The proposal has come under fire from the business and whistleblower communities, as well as lawmakers (43 SRLR 10, 1/3/11). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, 2010 SLT 1125, [2010] 1 WLR 2601 dealt with the refusal of leave to allow a devolution issue to be raised at the outset of the appeal as a determination of a devolution issue. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:27 am
False advertising: initially, the court rejected the attempt to require §43(a)(1)(B) claims to be pled with particularity, though my impression is that the trend is to apply Rule 9(b) to such claims. [read post]
