Search for: "Edwards v. State" Results 3401 - 3420 of 4,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
One of the most fundamental challenges IP enforcement in China faces is that there is state by law instead of state of law. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  The rules will almost certainly continue to be defined on a state-by-state basis and, if recent developments are any indication, the scales seem to be tipping in workers’ favor. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  The rules will almost certainly continue to be defined on a state-by-state basis and, if recent developments are any indication, the scales seem to be tipping in workers’ favor. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many years ago, I got into a strange sort of contretemps with Judge Harry Edwards of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Edwards, 398 F.3d 313, 318 (4th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 960 (2005); Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Edwards, 398 F.3d 313, 318 (4th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 960 (2005); Davis v. [read post]