Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 7,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm
While I think it's a good idea for a number of reasons, I especially would like to see federal anti-SLAPP protection for consumer reviews of vendors. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
California: The California Supreme Court holds that there is a good faith defense to the statutory penalties under Lab. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
California Sen. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
The ACLU has challenged these policies in Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
Another California state case, McVey v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Holding that a state donor insemination statute must be construed to allow the former lesbian partner of a woman who conceived two children during their relationship to seek a legal determination of parental rights, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled in Shineovich v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
The good news is that the California Legislature is being proactive on this front, too, petitioning the California Supreme Court in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
The panel discussed the Court’s two big cases involving same-sex marriage, United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992). [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:14 am
Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
Unfortunately, in the past year, many councils in California and nationwide have had their meetings disrupted by groups of remote attendees spewing racist and antisemitic vitriol. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Under Abry Partners V, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:59 am
Davidson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
She also asserted state law claims. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:16 am
In Kite [Athens Administrators v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
