Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 3,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2008, 5:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
The circuit court does note that it was contrary to the CVRA for the district court to permit and employ an ex parte proceeding that did not allow the victims to participate by conferring in advance of the plea agreement. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:11 am
It is somewhat paradoxical, then, that the recent Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:59 am
More on the 1987 Supreme Court ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
The case of Mann v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
" Ty Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
They should quit administering the paralytic drug that does nothing more than put a serene face on death.The decision in Baze v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
Brennan Jr., Thurgood Marshall and Harry A. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
For publication opinions today (3): Arthur Harris v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Rowling and Warner Bros. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:57 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
Finally, the good faith exception does not apply. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 11:00 pm
Rowling v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
" tone: mediation statement is to the mediator but truly it's a presentation to the party on the other side mediators he uses use psychological techniques to persuade the other side I'm dealing with an impressive opponent I need your help build confidence He like mediators who charge flat fee for a really long day he pays an enormous fee for a long day so that the parties will see it… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
