Search for: "In Re Mar"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 3,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
Previously: More Kindling (Mar. 9) Fitter, Happier, More Productive (Feb. 27) Take a look, it's in a book (Feb. 11) [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
The latest issue of the Journal du Droit International ("Clunet") (Vol. 137, no. 1, Janvier-Février-Mars 2009) is out. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
Mar. 31, 2009). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:45 pm
Prenons l'actualité récente : le rapport Darrois sur la grande profession du droit [1] : épisode 1 : l'annonce de sa sortie est une première fois repoussée fin février 2009. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
Securities Claims Exclusion In In re SRC Holding Corp.,[3] the Eighth Circuit applying Minnesota law, held that the plain language of a standard form securities exc [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:27 am
.): If you’re a marginalia maker, you’re in good company, historically speaking. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:43 pm
Mar. 9, 2009), the Court held that it is "not correct" that a "presumption of irreparable harm automatically arises upon the determination that a trade secret has been misappropriated. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Mar. 31, 2009), grows out of just such a situation -- although it's one step removed from the facts you'd expect. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 11:27 pm
J'ai relaté le 5 mars que l'OEB admettait maintenant l'envoi par epoline de documents relatifs aux procédures de recours.La décision T765/08 s'intéresse au sort d'un recours formé par voie électronique, avant que la décision du 26 février 2009 entre en… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:57 am
We're preparing for a mission to Mars. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Mar. 30, 2009).We confess that we'd forgotten all about this puppy, so you probably need a refresher on the facts, too.The case involved a small manufacturer of medical devices that was apparently struggling to market products despite its inability to obtain the necessary PMA or 510(k) approvals. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
This article does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship, and is not for re-publication without express permission of the author. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
This article does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney-client relationship, and is not for re-publication without express permission of the author. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:00 pm
And "MAR" didn't stand for March or Marzo, but for Martes, or Tuesday. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:42 am
This is an entrepreneur's issue, not a CVCA, MARs or anyone else's issue. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:37 pm
They don’t chase balls or catch Frisbees, but they’re kind of cute. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:56 am
Le Décret Exécutif No. 26 du 9 mars 2009 publié à la Gazette le 11 mars 2009 (ci après DE26) modifie le décret antérieur No. 320 du 8 août 2008. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Court of Appeal Mar. 30, 2009) (click here to read the opinion and weep for joy).After some preliminary skirmishing, the Vioxx consumers were pursuing claims under Canada's Consumer Protection Act, Competition Act, and common law of negligence, battery and deceit. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
Mar. 30, 2009), decision available here. [read post]
