Search for: "In re D. W." Results 3401 - 3420 of 4,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Fairbanks Scales Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court W D North Carolina: When an assignor is not stopped: Borgwarmer v Honeywell (Property, intangible) Bull in Bilski’s china shop: B of A’s financial instrument: Ex Parte Birle (12:01 Tuesday) District Court S D Florida: Court labels claims transformed in patent reexamination mere disguise: Aspex Eyewear v Marchon Eyewear (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court S D California:… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
"[W]here the plaintiff's factual allegations 'are not directly controverted, [they] are taken as true for purposes of determining jurisdiction . . . .'" Akro, 45 F.3d at 1543 (quoting Beverly Hills Fan, 21 F.3d at 1563). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:46 am by David Vasella
Eine Kommerzialisierung dieser Bezeichnung wäre geeignet, die religiösen Gefühle der katholischen Christen zu verletzen.DIese Sittenwidrigkeit betrifft das Zeichen unabhängig von den beanspruchten Waren und Dienstleistungen. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm by Jim Calloway
Gensler Download Oklahomas New EDiscovery Rules.Gensler.OklaBarJ Professor Gensler is the Welcome D. and W. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Roshonda Scipio
[Boston, MA] : Aspatore Books, c2010.Immigration(RES) KF4819.3 .K87 2010Kurzban's immigration law sourcebook : a comprehensive outline and reference tool / Ira J. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:13 am by John L. Welch
" In re LS&S Retail, Inc., Serial Nos. 77524535, 77525441, and 77525450 (September 30, 2010) [not precedential].Before reaching the ornamentality issue, the Board first affirmed Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark LAGUNA SURF & SPORT in standard character and two design forms for various clothing items and related retail store services, finding the marks likely to cause confusion with five registered marks comprising the word LAGUNA in standard character and… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Texas: Termination of patentee’s status as business entity does not eliminate capacity to assert patent infringement in Federal Court: NorthPoint Technology, LTD. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
We’re arguing that federal law, 21 U.S.C. [read post]