Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
Richard J. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
Jacksonville – le pont au-dessus de la Rivière St John [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
William J. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Poistron emission tomography (PET) gives a partial snapshot of organs in its view. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:10 pm
C. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:17 am
(IP Osgoode) General – Copyright Copyright 2.0 show – Episode 186 includes Universal v Lenz update, Marvel comic win against Stan Lee (PlagiarismToday) Australia Australia confirms ISPs are not copyright cops: Roadshow Films v iiNet (Ars Technica) (ipwars) (Excess Copyright) (IP Whiteboard) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) Lander J upholds Registrar’s decision to allow DIGITEK: Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd (ipwars) (ipwars) Canada Documentary organization… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
C. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:32 pm
J. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
J. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’ standard: Alexsam… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:25 pm
Pedro J. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Section 15(1) and paragraph 14(c) of Schedule 1 extend protection to a “fair and accurate report of any finding or decision” of an association that exists for the purpose of protecting the interests of a sport that is open to members of the public. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Re-examining acts of God. 27 Pace Envtl. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Title II - The Re-Opened Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 The Zadroga Act also reopens and significantly expands a number of aspects of the September 11th Victims Compensation Fund of 2001. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
This submission was based on sub-paragraph VI.E.7.3.3.c) of the 6th edition of the “Case Law” book as far as it is identical to the 5th edition (see sub-paragraph VI.E.6.2.2.c)). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
As Griffin J. said in Kendall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Bank, represented by its loan servicer, Select Portfolio Servicing (“SPS”), who was in turn represented by Buffalo’s most infamous foreclosure mill, Steven J. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
(IP Watch) Canada Déjà vu all over again on copyright and Canada/US trade? [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
J. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:52 am
Nicholas J. [read post]
