Search for: "JOHNSON v. THE STATE" Results 3401 - 3420 of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
Justice Wainwright delivered a concurring opinion.Justice Johnson delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Hecht and Justice Willett joined.Financial Industries Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
”But people accused in federal court obtained the right to counsel twenty-five years earlier in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While the trial court tossed that claim on its rear-end for failure to cite Section 1983, the Second Circuit (Calabresi, Hall and Rakoff [D.J.]) reinstates the claim under recent Supreme Court authority, Johnson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Williams… In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
United States that Johnson announced a new substantive constitutional rule that applies retroactively to ACCA cases on collateral review. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm by David Kopel
As they point out, the Text, History, and Tradition Test is the one used in Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
Court Rules Illegal Immigrants Have 2nd Amendment Rights:  In the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Johnson, 553 F.3d 990 (6th Cir. 2009), and United States v. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]