Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 6,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 8:24 am
Scott v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 11:19 am
In 2017, CRT started proceedings in France and the Netherlands to “seek an injunction of sales of Desperados against Heineken, arguing that Desperados violates the Mexican geographical indication (‘GI) ‘Tequila’ under EU law”. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:33 pm
Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am
Tapestry, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
In an August 15, 2013 ruling, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the cross motions for partial judgment of plaintiff L'Oreal USA, Inc. and defendant Trend Beauty Corp. in L'Oreal's action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims against Trend Beauty. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:39 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 10:18 am
Mirza v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
Continuing my effort to catch up on 2017 customs decision from the Court of International Trade, we come to Kalle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
And third, the decision shows that district court's have wide latitude, and an independent obligation, to assess a victim's economic loss even if the victim itself presents an estimate that might not be admissible under the rules of evidence.Sixth Circuit Opinion in USA v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:08 am
In Liqwd, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:12 am
Marathon Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:18 am
The result is that CIPPIC will be now be permitted to file a 20 page Memorandum of Fact and Law. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Energy (USA), LLC, 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013), declined to extend deference to, and disagreed with, the SEC’s interpretation of the Dodd-Frank protections. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
Richard Wolf of USA Today previews next week’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, with respect to contractual class action waivers in the context of non-waivable labor law rights. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Calvillo v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in MedellÃÂn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:12 am
” In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
