Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 5,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
Nevertheless, the court, having heard submissions on the second issue from counsel (as directed by the court), decided to state its views on the matter. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:23 am
From The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
Also, signs which cannot be seen -- such as smells -- may be registered in so far as they can be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, as the Court of Justice of the European Union indicated in Case C-273/00 Sieckmann v DPMA. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
” Bullard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
"This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:52 am
State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991)). [read post]
NCSLT Litigation Moratorium? – Expect confusion, inconsistent implementation, and need for follow-up
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm
It the count is based on suits that were expressly dismissed as time-barred either pursuant to a motion invoking this defense or court orders stating the reason for dismissal (in Texas, a trial court is not required to state a reason when granting summary judgment), it would be straightforward. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:05 am
., Inc. v Claiborne Johnston. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 am
The state offered these reports under the “business records” exception to the rule against hearsay and the defendant objected, claiming that the records were “testimonial” and therefore barred under Crawford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2006, 1:56 pm
The solution was suggested to me by the State's brief and its reliance on Slack v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 2:43 pm
(hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am
Alternate Electors Scheme (Light Green) 3. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:55 am
Bruen Ruling In the 2022 case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:55 am
Bruen Ruling In the 2022 case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
App. 1986).IndianaDefense informal interviews with treating physicians are barred in the Hoosier State as well. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
” Though many other definitions of the word exist, in light of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in AT&T v. [read post]
