Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 3401 - 3420 of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
  The Hostage tribunal, for example, refused to hold that killing hostages was per se criminal, even though Article II(1)(b) specifically deemed the “killing of hostages” a war crime (p. 216) – a reading that narrowed Law No. 10. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
(citation omitted), which has been referred to as “‘[p]robably the most significant difference in procedure between the FLSA’ and, in federal practice, class actions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 23,” id. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 3:44 am by familoo
I have heard similar said of the “this must stop” passages in Re B-S. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 7:06 am by Russell Knight
No matter what a parent testifies to, an Illinois divorce court is welcome to read between the lines and use the “loan” as reason to deviate from the guidelines. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
P. 23 or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by one or more representative persons as a class action. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
And for that matter, the other fans who were sitting nearby deserved far better from both Westbrook and Keisel. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 am
"Zuma's Commentary - http://drzuma.blogspot.com/ Sentencing Law and Policy: The latest news on Maryland's ...By Doug B. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§343-1(a) allows state enforcement of FDCA violations in the food area, and (b) a private action for violating the state consumer fraud statute, incorporating the standards of California's "little FDCA" statute (also known as the Sherman Act), which in turn just happens to incorporate the FDA's food standards, is a matter of "state," not "federal," enforcement. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Thirdly, the communication must be for the purpose of “seeking or giving advice with respect to any matter relating to the protection of an invention”. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:30 am
P. 12(h)(3) that if the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Marc Bhalla
R-E-S-P-E-C-T (just a little bit) It goes both ways. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 12:25 pm
"   The district court decided as a matter of law that the asserted claims were drawn to non-statutory subject matter and as such, unpatentable. [read post]