Search for: "MATTER OF R L T" Results 3401 - 3420 of 3,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v Garmin Int’l,… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Zur Vorgeschichte: Die Antragsteller Bernard L. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:53 pm
JASON ETTENGER â€" CASE NO. 2008-L-054 (PDF or here) Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08 MS 000039. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:15 am by Mike
Smith's performance was not worthy of $46,000: [T]he Honorable Justin L. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
JAKES: [L]ooking at what are useful arts, it does exclude some things. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:25 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
[T]he defense lawyers walk away unsanctioned, but their victory didn't come without a price. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:05 am
  And I guess the biggest difference is that you don’t get oral testimony, so you don’t have witnesses in your typical application proceeding. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:36 pm
 The answer is neither - and both - and when looking at the likely impact on the banking crisis, it really doesn't matter which. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:12 am by Alain Leibman
This inequality of approach will more likely than not lead to protracted litigation and uncertainty in the Madoff matter. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
We Laugh So We Won’t Cry It’s not all law and small-l libertarianism around here. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
It was pretty obviously made up in Smith so that the Court could pretend it wasn't overruling prior precedent. [read post]