Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 3401 - 3420
of 16,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
Hopefully this matter will be resolved for the next edition in six months time. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
” This too misses the mark. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
In the PORSCHE case, the dealer’s unauthorized use of the “PORSCHE” and the logo in its exhibition hall, on the automobiles in the exhibition hall, and in its brochure infringed the German manufacturer’s trade mark rights. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am
Gov’t seeking to bar registration of the mark: Whether, when the Lanham Act states generic terms may not be registered as trademarks, the addition by an online business of a generic top-level domain (“.com”) to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
I suspect it won’t this time either. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:39 am
And that’s a complicated matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:39 am
And that’s a complicated matter. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:00 pm
The New Yorker [unpaywalled] – “How do we hold on to what matters in a distracted age? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
The third, Mark Anderson, was apparently more peripatetic. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:55 pm
But symbols, no matter how iconic, cannot be allowed to stand in the way of innovation” (Simon Walker, Britain’s Institute of Directors). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:43 pm
But the conference didn’t – and, in reality, surely couldn’t – remove any of the formidable question marks that hang over the futures of the BMO Harris Bradley Center, the Bucks, and a possible new sports and entertainment franchise in Milwaukee. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:19 am
The fact that it was used to link to the whole ad didn’t matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
Then ruthlessly avoid paying for what you don’t need. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:25 pm
But when getting involved in Internet related matters, it's wise for law firms to appreciate the negative PR bounce that may ensue. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
TRADE-MARKS LAWCanadian trade-marks law works remarkably well – which is quite understandable for those who know its history. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:30 am
[COUNSEL]: No, Your Honor, because the subject matter of [that] case was diocesan property.THE COURT: And wouldn't—if there's a mistake in Judge Ortbal's order, wouldn't you have to bring a motion to correct that? [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
The Second Depatment held, "[t]he defendants failed to preserve for appellate review their argument that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of negligence on the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish proximate cause. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:00 am
This could have major repercussions for uses of trade marks as keywords. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:27 pm
And don't try to use bankruptcy as a threat, because that won't work; the collector will receive the bankruptcy as a relief, because then he no longer has to keep calling you and failing to collect, which earns him bad marks from his boss. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
If I had thought it was going to be more of a show-trial or witch hunt I would have gone so I could record the insanity.]Here's a letter by former UW law student Mark A. [read post]
