Search for: "Miller, Appeal of"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
The Court of Appeal asserted the 2005 Executive Order “was based on then-available climate science and represented California’s share of worldwide GHG reductions necessary to stabilize climate. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
” While its heart may have been in the right place, the Court of Appeal’s reasoning in this case is certainly questionable. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
The Court of Appeal recently reaffirmed CEQA’s fundamental boundaries, holding that CEQA only requires analyzing physical impacts on the environment, not economic impacts on government services. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The Chief Justice, further addressing the City’s and Court of Appeal’s position that the ordinance’s potential for resulting in physical impacts was “speculative” and not “reasonably foreseeable,” asked whether this wasn’t “in the eye of the beholder,” noting that “certainly” building 30 dispensaries “will have some sort of effect. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am
The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
As previously summarized here, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) in Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods held that the university’s enrollment increases were not statutorily exempt under Public Resources Code section 21080.09, which requires an EIR for long range development plans (“LRDPs”). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
The balance of the morning’s argument thus turned on whether, in light of the rulings—Miller v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 12:10 pm
The plaintiff then appealed. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The trial court denied the writ petition of a group of neighboring residents seeking to set aside the city’s project approvals on CEQA and due process grounds, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The trial court denied the writ petition of a group of neighboring residents seeking to set aside the city’s project approvals on CEQA and due process grounds, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:40 am
Miller's banks, and their investment banking arms like Ms. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
That case involved the retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:18 pm
Uniloc appealed the Apple decision and (again, in my view) would have likely won on appeal. . . [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
Bronwyn Catherine Miller was appointed by Rick Scott in 2018. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
(While sometimes unavoidable due to the timing of the engagement, last minute “document dumps” are guaranteed not to endear those bringing administrative appeals to local electeds and their staff members.) [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and directed the summary dismissal of proceedings. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
The Hill reports that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the government’s appeal of a Virginia-based district judge’s order blocking Trump’s revised travel ban executive order. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:57 pm
Miller v. [read post]
