Search for: "Moore, Appeal of" Results 3401 - 3420 of 3,606
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2008, 11:20 pm
Moore, about Tom Goldstein has this post with links to the briefs of the Commonwealth and the respondent. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
We retain jurisdiction of this appeal pending action by the juvenile court. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 10:40 am
Very little mention of relevant case law, just Lemley & Moore, Lemley & Moore, and (more) Lemley & Moore. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
The Tennessee Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide is a compilation of resources for individuals with cerebral palsy and their families. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 1:02 am
Judge Moore concurred in the judgment, but would have adopted a different definition of "substantial burden" under RLUIPA: I would adopt the substantial-burden standard established by the Seventh Circuit.... [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
Public defenders representing Bailey have asked the court to consider an expedited appeal of Moores' original ruling. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:22 am
Andrea Moore (NFP) - "Appellant-Respondent Robert Crawley appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to set aside the paternity affidavit filed in response to Appellee-Petitioner Andrea Moore's petition to establish paternity to provide support pursuant to the execution of the paternity affidavit. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
Hence, Moore has failed to show that her right to due process was violated. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 3:06 am
On appeal, Judge Moore (with Judge Dyk) couldn??? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:32 am
"According to the opinion by Circuit Judge Moore: . . . [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law BIA Abused Discretion by Failing to Consider Documents as to Changed Conditions in China Zhi Yun Gao v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:02 pm
In Egyptian Goddess, the patentee argued that the point of novelty of its ornamental fingernail buffer design[4] is the unique combination of four elements found in the design.[5] In the appeal, the Federal Circuit (Judge Moore) held that a combination of known elements may serve as a point of novelty – but only if the combination represents a “non-trivial advance over the prior art. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:20 pm
Scott Greenfield has two interesting posts from New York - first he considers what happens when judges go bad, and second he is thankful that the New York Court of Appeals, in a 6 page decision, rejected the crime of standing. [read post]