Search for: "Morales v. United States" Results 3401 - 3420 of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
Blount did not hold himself out as a representative of the United States government. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
In order to grant designers the incentive to continue creating the newest trends, they must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that legal remedies exist in order to counteract design piracy.[15] In the past, designers took pride in their works being imitated as product ideas trickled down from the high-end runways to the mass markets.[16] However, now that knockoffs, specifically counterfeits, have become a multi-billion dollar industry, designers and manufacturers recognize imitation as a… [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
We hope that this collection will help to contextualize the current legal and policy debates on the use of the term “genocide” and the international processes for deploying this morally and legally weighty term. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  That is to adopt a willfully blind form of legal positivism that simply ignores any questions either of political prudence or, at least as importantly, morality. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:19 am
Many features of a political culture can cause people to think of themselves as a collective subject that persists over time; but, at least in the United States, our Constitution also performs this function. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
Professor Hany Farid is a computer science professor at Dartmouth College in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:01 am by Frank Pasquale
” By any measure, the United States is a constitutional republic in name only. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
” More broadly, it is a state of balance, peace, blessing, bounty and wholeness in which all is right with the world because proper rules are being followed: “Hozho reflects the intellectual concept of order, the emotional state of happiness, the moral notions of good and fairness, the biological condition of health and well-being, and the artistic characteristics of balance, harmony, and beauty. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
”[18] Meanwhile, critics argue against ethics-driven restitution as having “weak connections to modern states’ culture or having merely political or moral sentiment without a legal basis. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
Chuck Law - Education - Law school - United States - Mayer Brown [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:29 am by Russell Knight
  Finally, the right to parent your children and make decisions for your children is a fundamental right per the Supreme Court Of The United States. [read post]