Search for: "People v Dollar"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 1:58 pm
V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” The court concluded: There is no contested issue for which a hearing is required (Goodman v Lovett, 200 AD2d 670, 670 [2d Dept 1994]). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:33 am
See: Seattle Times v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
It’s a good system in my humble opinion, one that ensures far more people and small businesses have access to justice, instead of restricting our courts to the wealthiest corporations and individuals who can afford to pay the tens of thousands of dollars a month minimum (not to mention the retainer) charged by most patent infringement lawyers. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
” FBI v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Hutcheson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
Jenkins, and Richlin Security Service Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
Aereo and WNET v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
In another case this week, AT&T v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 8:43 am
Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., Thornton v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 8:00 am
The IRS ѕtісkѕ bу its рrіnсіраl of not prosecuting people whо voluntarily fіlе thеіr old tax rеturnѕ. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In an environment where clients hire lawyers, not law firms, the rational response from law firms is to allocate their marginal dollars towards attracting and retaining the lawyers clients hire. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
After an entire decade of explaining to people that CMS approval is totally voluntary, not mandated by any law or regulation, and the dollar thresholds totally arbitrary and there only to limit the number of cases that CMS does allow for review, I now only have to forward a link to the newest memo to make my point. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Just take as much as you can to your bottom line, don’t book anything to your reserve account, and pay out those multi-billion dollar bonuses like last year and the year before. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
Their millions of dollars place a provision on a statewide ballot initiative. [read post]
