Search for: "People v High" Results 3401 - 3420 of 15,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Unlimited wants in the sense that people generally prefer more to less of most goods. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:06 am by Sean Wajert
  One of the issues was the high percentage of people in the control group in the survey who answered "don't know/not sure. [read post]
Australian Attorney-General Michaelia Cash referenced a recent case in Australia’s High Court: Fairfax Media publications Pty Ltd v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:10 am by Terry Hart
and Grand Theft Auto V: How Profits Soar when Piracy is Managed. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Burwell, one of the challenges to the availability of tax subsidies for people who buy health insurance on exchanges created by the federal government. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
  He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am by Rachit Buch
Calver, R (on the application of) v The Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) - Read judgment The decision to censure a Welsh councillor for comments on his blog was a disproportionate interference with his right to freedom of expression, the High Court has ruled. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm by Isabel McArdle
Prashant Modi v United Kingdom Border Agency [2010] EWHC 1996 – Read judgment Mr Justice Burnett in the High Court has found that there was no breach of a man’s right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights) when he was refused entry to the UK for business purposes after conviction for a sexual offence. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
"2. the representations made in the letter to the estate agents were false and that, to a "high degree of probability", Mr Brown knew that what he was saying was dishonest by the standards of reasonable and honest people. [read post]