Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 3,688
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2018, 4:38 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Other times, the seller. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:38 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 5:12 am
Based on Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] See Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
When the seller isn’t going anywhere, and nobody else is likely to buy the property, then you can wait. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am
In 2018, Brightstar—one of Harvestar’s biggest customers and a seller of refurbished phones—purchased a 51% controlling stock interest in Harvestar. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Allegations of fraud also increase with economic stringency – as indeed does fraud – as trading conditions worsen and liquidity deteriorates.13 Sellers misrepresent their products, straightened borrowers conceal their circumstances to obtain finance, traders lacking liquidity charge their assets (often receivables) to different lenders to obtain funds. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
The court relied on a recent decision from the Supreme Court of the United States, Kokesh v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
The authority of the decision maker is critical.[15] Cost or pricing data are limited to information a reasonably prudent buyer or seller would expect to affect price negotiations significantly.[16] This is a “reasonable person” standard. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” In 1933, the year the Securities Act was enacted, Roosevelt said, “It changes the ancient doctrine of caveat emptor to ‘let the seller beware,’ and puts the burden on the seller rather than on the buyer. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:55 am
Evans v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:08 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:42 am
Plaid Inc and Evans v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
