Search for: "STEVENS v. STATE" Results 3401 - 3420 of 7,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:12 am
The Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in Herring v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Nearly three decades later, Justices Scalia and O'Connor picked up the judicial takings theme in a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Holland & Hart
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
’” And in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Today the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Black v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
Justices Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens dissented. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (right, credit), summarizing and quoting the conclusions drawn by New York University Professor David Garland in his just-published book, Peculiar Institution: America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition.In the same review, Stevens restated his own conclusion, which he had announced in his opinion in Baze v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:16 am by Juliette Rousselot
This case serves as a sad reminder of the state of LGBT rights in much of Africa. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:50 pm
"Our experience during the past three decades has demonstrated that delays in state-sponsored killings are inescapable and that executing defendants after such is unacceptably cruel," said Justice John Paul Stevens, who disagreed with the court's decision to allow the execution to proceed. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 2:50 pm
The following came to me from The Indiana Lawyer:In Steven Peters v. [read post]