Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2023, 6:33 am
” Securities analysts lowered their ratings on KeyCorp’s stock, causing a sharp drop in the company’s share price. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:45 pm
A majority cannot bind a minority as to whether a transfer was fraudulent, and it's a long-standing principle in bankruptcy (Moore v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am
The Court of Appeal overturned that result, but the outcome was less noteworthy than the Court’s sharp criticism of what it called a “secret trial”. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:59 pm
The complaint alleges that during the class period, the defendants failed to disclose that: “(i) rising interest rates, inflation, and trends in returning to work away from home were in fact quickly eroding then-heightened demand for Stanley’s tools and outdoor products; (ii) the heightened, extraordinary demand Stanley had enjoyed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 and into 2022 was returning to 2019 pre-pandemic levels; (iii) Stanley’s operations were already showing… [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:01 am
His broadcast industry experience includes the set up/ launch of 3 broadcast channels in India: Channel [V], Star Plus and Vijay TV and several production consultancy assignments. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:51 pm
Events in Eastern Europe have yielded some sharp practice relating to the interaction of IMF requested austerity measures and national Constitutional Courts. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
I propose that the case should be referred back to the General Court in order for the latter to undertake those assessments and to give another ruling consistent with them".Bravo, says the IPKat -- now here's an Advocate General who speaks his mind and knows how to give the Court of First Instance -- now the General Court -- a sharp cuff around the ear when necessary. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The Fifth Amendment right to deprivation of liberty only based on facts proved beyond a reasonable doubt requires a different, and stricter level of compliance, as we know from the contrasting cases on retroactivity: "yes" on reasonable doubt (Ivan V. and Hankerson); "no" on judge rather than jury where the reasonable doubt right is intact (Summerlin).While addressing the Sixth Amendment, Cunningham clearly expresses the constitutional norm that increased punishment… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:39 am
” (Tesoro del Valle v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:59 am
” New York v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am
Floyd LJ noted that whether this will in fact occur is “intensely” fact specific, and on the facts of this case, the expedited trial brings the issue of a price spiral into “sharp focus” (more strong words…). [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:43 pm
See: USA v Amawi.However, the possibility that the American defendants might be "brought to justice"outside the extradition process might give pause to some who had assumed that this only affected non-citizens. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm
I was recently reading a decision from a federal appeals court in a case called Sterngold Dental, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm
Fry Consulting Pty Ltd v Sports Warehouse Inc (No 2) [2012] FCA 81 Share on Facebook [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 7:05 am
At that time, the CAF responded by establishing the Standards for Harassment and Racism Program (SHARP), a sensitization and skills development program intended to change attitudes and behaviours. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
This part of Kinsley’s review has provoked sharp disagreement from the New York Times’s public editor, Margaret Sullivan, who writes: Mr. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
The case, Loving v IRS, was filed last year on March 13, 2012, in response to regulations put forth by the IRS in an effort to monitor tax preparers. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
