Search for: "State v. David."
Results 3401 - 3420
of 14,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
Facts: This case (Session v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
A federal district court’s recent ruling in Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Sanders, David M. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Lawson, 129 USPQ2d 1036 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:16 am
The Second Edition of David Stone's design classic: European Design Law: A Practitioner's Guide is officially an award winner (Best Design Book - Kat pat!). [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Krstić and a “turning point” appellate ruling in Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Conway, III and David A. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
David A. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:03 am
Golden v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:02 am
But the Illinois state courts, unburdened by federal standing law, may yet give teeth to this seriously dumb law as Rosenbach v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
But the Illinois state courts, unburdened by federal standing law, may yet give teeth to this seriously dumb law as Rosenbach v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:12 am
In 1982, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the case of Suastez v. [read post]
