Search for: "State v. Downes"
Results 3401 - 3420
of 35,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 2:48 am
On 30 July 2021, Saini J handed down judgment on the Defendant’s strike-out application in Warren v DSG Retail Limited [2021] EWHC 2168 (QB). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:07 pm
Epps v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:28 pm
In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am
In Abood v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not prevent a judicial… [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Clement stepped down in June. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In May, in AT&T v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court handed down a significant decision in Padilla v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
Our neighbor, Missouri, is down to just one clinic, and the state is using bogus restrictions to shut it down. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:46 am
Wayfair was handed down. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:50 am
People United for Medical Marijuana Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm
Chaplinsky: The conflict then seemed to quiet down. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 pm
Coakley) and the extent of state power to regulate abortion by uses of drugs rather than surgery (Cline v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:06 am
Proper DWI Jury Instructions The Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its decision in Burnett v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Indiana, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 8:56 am
The case, California v. [read post]
